Compare commits

..
6 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5 af942aca27 v0.14.7: changelog and README
Release / build (push) Successful in 5m33s
Release / notes (push) Successful in 4s
CI / test (push) Successful in 10m30s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-16 20:11:26 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5 3e7dd20bad One machine runs one judge, on up to four cores
CI / test (push) Successful in 9m1s
A second judge replica on the same machine shares its cores and is lost
with it, so it bought nothing but half the speed of each. On a 4-core,
8 GB single-machine install, one judge on four cores passed 20 of 20
requests at about 3.5 s each, judged in and out. Two judges on two cores
each had passed 19 of 20.

server init now serves one judge when this machine is the only node, and
two, on two cores each and spread over the nodes, where there will be
others (HA setups, or a control plane that is not a node).
--judge-replicas and the setup's Copies still choose. install.md gives
the measured times in place of "half a second".

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-16 19:35:42 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5 f8206c3540 A judge reserves two cores and 2 GB, with no prompt cache
CI / test (push) Successful in 9m1s
Checked by a single-machine install of v0.14.6 on a 4-core, 8 GB VM. The
second judge fitted nowhere: v0.14.6 reserved 4 GB a judge, a figure from
one replica that grew to 3.2 GB through llama.cpp's prompt cache (up to
8 GB by default), which a judge never reuses. Once it fitted, every
judgment timed out. v0.14.6 gave a judge one core below 8 CPUs, and a
judgment of about 280 tokens takes 8.0 s on one core, 4.2 s on two and
2.3 s on four, against a 5 s budget: 0 of 20 requests went through.

A judge now runs with --cache-ram 0, uses about 1.6 GB and reserves 2,
and reserves two cores (one only below four CPUs). On the same VM, 19 of
20 went through.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-16 19:22:33 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5 0def6eaba1 CI: run on maas-packer, the runner that serves this Gitea, given 8 cores and 32 GB
CI / test (push) Successful in 9m1s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-16 18:15:58 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5 645be2d278 CI: run again on the runner given 8 cores and 32 GB
CI / test (push) Canceled after 12s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-16 17:49:44 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5 25c4ec9f2a CI: a package that hangs says which test it hung in
CI / test (push) Failing after 30m4s
Every test run since c22528c ended at the job's 30-minute deadline with
nothing after internal/release, while the same tests pass with -race on
Linux, as a user and as root, in 5 minutes. A 12-minute test timeout makes
the hang name itself.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-16 16:54:48 +02:00
9 changed files with 150 additions and 40 deletions

No files matched your search

+5 -1
View File
@@ -34,7 +34,11 @@ jobs:
run: go vet ./...
- name: Test with the race detector
run: go test -race ./...
# Under the job's limit, so a package that hangs panics with the
# test it was in and where every goroutine waited, rather than the
# job ending at its deadline with nothing said: from 2026-10-15 every
# run did, printing nothing after internal/release.
run: go test -race -timeout 12m ./...
- name: Build
run: go build ./...
+39 -1
View File
@@ -18,12 +18,50 @@ is only released once its **exit criterion** is met, not when its code lands.
| v0.11.0 | — | High availability from setup, the setup and console screens, usage sums and per-tenant alerts | released |
| v0.12.0 | — | The cluster's settings in the store, in force when changed; the firewall switch; wipe | released |
| v0.13.0 | — | The whole system stopped and started from one command; Qwen3Guard judges, on a GPU and CPUs together | released |
| v0.14.0 | — | Knowledge bases: documents from people's own machines, kept apart per tenant, answered from | released (v0.14.1: adapters, the tree over the API, the firewall on every machine; v0.14.2: pictures from ComfyUI; v0.14.3: 3D models as jobs; v0.14.4: any ComfyUI workflow as a job, presets, licences; v0.14.5: picture and 3D models that add themselves; v0.14.6: setup that explains every part and lets it be chosen, the gateway on all three HA machines) |
| v0.14.0 | — | Knowledge bases: documents from people's own machines, kept apart per tenant, answered from | released (v0.14.1: adapters, the tree over the API, the firewall on every machine; v0.14.2: pictures from ComfyUI; v0.14.3: 3D models as jobs; v0.14.4: any ComfyUI workflow as a job, presets, licences; v0.14.5: picture and 3D models that add themselves; v0.14.6: setup that explains every part and lets it be chosen, the gateway on all three HA machines; v0.14.7: the judge sized for its machine) |
| v1.0.0 | 5 | What phase 5 has left: precise KV routing proven on vLLM, the block cost picker, defragmentation across NVLink domains, prefill/decode disaggregation | planned |
Until v1.0.0 the minor version is the breaking one: configuration formats and Go
APIs change between minors without a deprecation period.
## v0.14.7 — 2026-10-16
The judge installed by `server init` sized for what it does. On a machine
of fewer than eight cores v0.14.6 left every judgment past its budget, so
`fail: closed` refused every request. A single-machine install of v0.14.7
on a 4-core VM passed 20 of 20, and on 8 cores 20 of 20 under load.
**Upgrading.**
- No migration.
- **Upgrading does not change a judge already in the catalog.** v0.14.6
and earlier installed two judges, reserving no cores or one, and 2 or
4 GB. To give them what they need:
`llmgw ctl model resources qwen3guard-0.6b --memory 2 --cores 2`, then
`llmgw ctl restart --model qwen3guard-0.6b`. The two then need four cores
on a single machine; below that, a longer `latency_budget` or
`fail: open`.
- On a node whose cores are all reserved, `ctl restart --model` cannot
start the new replica beside the old one and waits. Stop the old engine
process, and the replica comes back with the new figures.
### Fixed
- **Both judges fit an 8 GB machine again.** v0.14.6 had `server init` reserve 4 GB a judge replica. That figure came
from one replica at 3.2 GB after a day of traffic. The growth was llama.cpp's prompt cache, up to 8 GB by default,
which a judge never reuses: each text it reads is different. On a 4-core, 8 GB machine the second judge then fitted
nowhere ("has 7 GB of memory with 1 free, needs 4"). The judge now runs with `--cache-ram 0`, uses about 1.6 GB and
stays there, and reserves 2.
- **One machine runs one judge, on up to four cores.** A second replica on the same machine shares its cores and is
lost with it, so it bought nothing but half the speed of each. `server init` on a single machine now serves one judge
on up to four cores (2.3 s a judgment where two on two cores took 4.2). Where there will be other nodes, it serves two
on two cores each, as in HA setups. `--judge-replicas` and the setup's Copies still choose.
- **A judge gets the two cores it needs.** v0.14.6 gave each judge replica one core on machines under eight. A judgment
of about 280 tokens takes 8.0 s on one core, 4.2 s on two and 2.3 s on four, against the 5 s budget, so on a 4-core
machine every judgment timed out and every request was refused. Where there are two judges, each now reserves two
cores (one only below four CPUs), and the one judge of a single machine up to four; the starter has what is left, or
shares when nothing is. A judge on two cores stays close to its budget: give it more cores or a GPU, or raise
`latency_budget`, where requests must not wait.
## v0.14.6 — 2026-10-16
Setup that says what each part of an install is and lets every one be
+1 -1
View File
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ Releases track the roadmap phases; see [CHANGELOG.md](CHANGELOG.md).
| v0.11.0 | — | High availability from setup, the setup and console screens, usage sums and per-tenant alerts | released |
| v0.12.0 | — | The cluster's settings in the store, in force when changed; the firewall switch; wipe | released |
| v0.13.0 | — | The whole system stopped and started from one command; Qwen3Guard judges, on a GPU and CPUs together | released |
| v0.14.0 | — | Knowledge bases: documents from people's own machines, kept apart per tenant, answered from | released (v0.14.1: adapters, the tree over the API, the firewall on every machine; v0.14.2: pictures from ComfyUI; v0.14.3: 3D models as jobs; v0.14.4: any ComfyUI workflow as a job, presets, licences; v0.14.5: picture and 3D models that add themselves; v0.14.6: setup that explains every part and lets it be chosen, the gateway on all three HA machines) |
| v0.14.0 | — | Knowledge bases: documents from people's own machines, kept apart per tenant, answered from | released (v0.14.1: adapters, the tree over the API, the firewall on every machine; v0.14.2: pictures from ComfyUI; v0.14.3: 3D models as jobs; v0.14.4: any ComfyUI workflow as a job, presets, licences; v0.14.5: picture and 3D models that add themselves; v0.14.6: setup that explains every part and lets it be chosen, the gateway on all three HA machines; v0.14.7: the judge sized for its machine) |
| v1.0.0 | 5 | What phase 5 has left: precise KV routing proven on vLLM, the block cost picker, defragmentation across NVLink domains, prefill/decode disaggregation | planned |
As of v0.6.0 a cluster runs unattended: agents report their hardware, the
+15 -11
View File
@@ -152,9 +152,9 @@ That is the whole step. In order, it:
`nvidia-smi` finds any, on CPU otherwise — and waits for it to install its
engine
9. closes llmgw's internal ports to everything but the cluster's networks
10. fetches Qwen3Guard-Gen 0.6B, the guardrails' judge, and runs two
replicas on the CPUs of nodes with room — this one, or the first that
join ([guardrails.md](guardrails.md#a-judge-model) has one on a GPU too)
10. fetches Qwen3Guard-Gen 0.6B, the guardrails' judge, and runs it on
CPUs: one replica on up to four cores when this machine is the only
node, two on two cores each on the nodes of a larger cluster ([guardrails.md](guardrails.md#a-judge-model) has one on a GPU too)
11. fetches Qwen2.5 0.5B into the mirror and serves it on this node, so the
first thing anyone opens `/chat` to find is a model that answers. A
machine without room for it is told so within two minutes, and why.
@@ -187,15 +187,19 @@ demonstration one:
| Requests | every key limited (60 a minute, 200 000 tokens a minute) and priced, so budgets bind |
| Guardrails | the `baseline` policy on every request: secrets in prompts and answers refused, card numbers masked, injection attempts recorded, and the judge refusing violence, crime, weapons, child abuse, privacy violations, hate, self-harm and sexual content, in prompts and answers |
The judge runs as two replicas, each on a CPU — about half a second for a
short text on any CPU with AVX2 — and reads a streamed answer every 600
characters. The policy fails **closed**: a request the judge cannot read
within 5 seconds is refused with 503 rather than served unjudged, and
`judge_unavailable` goes to the notification webhooks. Two replicas are what
make that bearable; on one small machine, or a VM without AVX2 (see
The judge runs on CPUs. A judgment of about 280 tokens took 2.3 s on four
cores, 4.2 s on two and 8.0 s on one (a 4-core VM). It also reads a
streamed answer every 600 characters. The policy fails **closed**: a request
the judge cannot read within 5 seconds is refused with 503 rather than
served unjudged, and `judge_unavailable` goes to the notification webhooks.
So a judge gets cores of its own: on one machine one replica on up to four,
and on a larger cluster two replicas of two cores each, spread over its nodes
so that losing one leaves the other. On a machine of fewer than four cores,
a busy one, or a VM without AVX2 (see
[step 6](#6-setting-the-nodes-cpu-model-if-it-is-a-vm)), the judge is the
first thing to fail, so `fail: open` — serve it, recorded as flagged — or
`--no-guard-model` is the choice there. Defamation, specialized advice,
first thing to fail. The choices there are a longer `latency_budget`,
`fail: open` (serve the request, recorded as flagged), the judge on a GPU,
or `--no-guard-model`. Defamation, specialized advice,
intellectual property and elections are left out of what it refuses: they
catch too much ordinary work. [guardrails.md](guardrails.md) has the rest.
+15 -1
View File
@@ -194,6 +194,9 @@ func (in *serverInit) judgeFor() judgeSpec {
}
if j.Replicas <= 0 {
j.Replicas = 2
if in.singleMachine() {
j.Replicas = 1
}
}
if j.Budget <= 0 {
j.Budget = 5 * time.Second
@@ -201,6 +204,14 @@ func (in *serverInit) judgeFor() judgeSpec {
return j
}
// singleMachine is an install where this machine is the only node there
// will be, as far as init knows: a second judge replica there shares the
// same cores and is lost with the same machine, so it buys nothing but
// half the speed of each.
func (in *serverInit) singleMachine() bool {
return !in.noNode && !in.standbys && len(in.patroni) == 0 && len(in.patroniNodes) == 0
}
// The configuration's limits, as init writes them unless told otherwise.
const (
defaultRPM = 60
@@ -346,7 +357,10 @@ func (in *serverInit) initFlags() []string {
if in.noGuardModel {
add("--no-guard-model")
} else {
j, d := in.judgeFor(), (&serverInit{}).judgeFor()
// Against the defaults for an install of the same shape: one judge
// on one machine, two otherwise.
shape := serverInit{noNode: in.noNode, standbys: in.standbys, patroni: in.patroni, patroniNodes: in.patroniNodes}
j, d := in.judgeFor(), shape.judgeFor()
if j.Fail != d.Fail {
add("--judge-fail", j.Fail)
}
+40 -7
View File
@@ -183,12 +183,17 @@ func TestTheJudgesAndTheStarterShareTheCPUsRatherThanEachTakingAll(t *testing.T)
in serverInit
judge, starter int
}{
{serverInit{cpus: 4}, 1, 2},
{serverInit{cpus: 8}, 2, 4},
{serverInit{cpus: 32}, 2, 8},
{serverInit{cpus: 2}, 1, 0}, // nothing left: the starter shares rather than fits nowhere
// One machine: one judge, on up to four cores; the starter has the rest.
{serverInit{cpus: 4}, 4, 0},
{serverInit{cpus: 8}, 4, 4},
{serverInit{cpus: 32}, 4, 8},
{serverInit{cpus: 2}, 2, 0},
{serverInit{cpus: 1}, 0, 0},
{serverInit{cpus: 4, noGuardModel: true}, 1, 4},
{serverInit{cpus: 4, noGuardModel: true}, judgeCores, 4}, // no judge: all for the starter
// Two asked for on one machine: two cores each, one each where two
// would not fit both.
{serverInit{cpus: 8, judge: judgeSpec{Replicas: 2}}, 2, 4},
{serverInit{cpus: 2, judge: judgeSpec{Replicas: 2}}, 1, 0},
{serverInit{cpus: 8, judge: judgeSpec{Replicas: 3}}, 2, 2},
{serverInit{cpus: 4, noNode: true}, 2, 0}, // on nodes not known yet
} {
@@ -198,11 +203,39 @@ func TestTheJudgesAndTheStarterShareTheCPUsRatherThanEachTakingAll(t *testing.T)
}
}
m := guardModel("http://x/g.gguf", 2, 1)
if p := m.Profiles[0]; p.CPUCores != 1 || p.MinMemoryGB != 4 {
t.Errorf("judge profile: %d cores, %d GB", p.CPUCores, p.MinMemoryGB)
if p := m.Profiles[0]; p.CPUCores != 1 || p.MinMemoryGB != 2 || !slices.Contains(p.Args, "--cache-ram") {
t.Errorf("judge profile: %d cores, %d GB, args %v", p.CPUCores, p.MinMemoryGB, p.Args)
}
s := starterModel(starterChoices[0], defaultContext, 2, "http://x/q.gguf", []string{"6000-24g"}, true)
if cpu := s.Profiles[len(s.Profiles)-1]; cpu.Name != "cpu" || cpu.CPUCores != 2 || s.Profiles[0].CPUCores != 0 {
t.Errorf("starter: GPU profile %d cores, CPU %+v", s.Profiles[0].CPUCores, cpu)
}
}
// A second judge on the same machine shares its cores and is lost with it:
// one machine has one, more machines two.
func TestOneMachineHasOneJudgeAndMoreHaveTwo(t *testing.T) {
for _, c := range []struct {
in serverInit
want int
}{
{serverInit{}, 1},
{serverInit{noNode: true}, 2},
{serverInit{patroni: []string{"a@db1", "b@db2"}}, 2},
{serverInit{standbys: true}, 2},
{serverInit{judge: judgeSpec{Replicas: 3}}, 3},
} {
if got := c.in.judgeFor().Replicas; got != c.want {
t.Errorf("%+v: %d judges, want %d", c.in, got, c.want)
}
}
// The defaults are left out of the command; a choice against them is in.
ha := serverInit{noNode: true, patroni: []string{"a@db1", "b@db2"}, judge: judgeSpec{Replicas: 2}}
if f := strings.Join(ha.initFlags(), " "); strings.Contains(f, "--judge-replicas") {
t.Errorf("two judges on three machines named: %s", f)
}
one := serverInit{judge: judgeSpec{Replicas: 2}}
if f := strings.Join(one.initFlags(), " "); !strings.Contains(f, "--judge-replicas 2") {
t.Errorf("two judges on one machine not named: %s", f)
}
}
+32 -17
View File
@@ -496,10 +496,13 @@ func guardModel(source string, replicas, cores int) catalog.Model {
// judge that is not there refuses everything.
Scaling: catalog.Scaling{Min: replicas, Max: replicas},
Profiles: []catalog.Profile{{
// It uses about 3.2 GB with its context: reserving 2 filled nodes
// past their memory.
Name: "cpu", Engine: "llamacpp", Priority: 100, MinMemoryGB: 4, CPUCores: cores,
Args: []string{"--ctx-size", "8192"},
// About 1.6 GB with its context, which stays so with no prompt
// cache: llama.cpp keeps up to 8 GB of prompts by default, and a
// judge's, each a different text, are not asked again. With the
// cache one grew to 3.2 GB over a day of traffic; reserving 4 for
// that left a 7 GB machine room for only one of the two.
Name: "cpu", Engine: "llamacpp", Priority: 100, MinMemoryGB: judgeMemoryGB, CPUCores: cores,
Args: []string{"--ctx-size", "8192", "--cache-ram", "0"},
}},
}
}
@@ -716,14 +719,16 @@ type cpuSplit struct{ judge, starter int }
// the starter on one 4-core control plane all ran on all four: under load
// most judgments missed their budget and the requests were refused.
//
// When this machine is the node, by its own CPUs: a core a judge under 8,
// two from 8, and the starter what is left, up to 8, or no reservation at
// all when nothing is, rather than a starter that fits nowhere. Otherwise
// two a judge, on whichever node takes it, and the starter, on a node not
// known yet, none.
// A judge needs cores: a judgment of about 280 tokens took 8.0 s on one,
// 4.2 s on two and 2.3 s on four, against a 5 s budget. On one machine its
// one replica gets up to four; where there are two, two each (one each only
// where two would not fit both). The starter has what is left, up to 8, or
// no reservation at all when nothing is, rather than a starter that fits
// nowhere. A machine that is not the node reserves two a judge on whichever
// node takes it, and the starter, on a node not known yet, none.
func (in *serverInit) cpuPlan() cpuSplit {
if in.noNode {
return cpuSplit{judge: 2}
return cpuSplit{judge: judgeCores}
}
n := in.cpus
if n <= 0 {
@@ -736,13 +741,23 @@ func (in *serverInit) cpuPlan() cpuSplit {
if !in.noGuardModel {
judges = in.judgeFor().Replicas
}
judge := 1
if n >= 8 {
judge = 2
}
left := n - judges*judge
if left < 1 {
left = 0
judge := judgeCores
switch {
case judges == 1:
judge = min(n, judgeCoresAlone)
case judges > 0 && judges*judge > n:
judge = max(1, n/judges)
}
left := max(n-judges*judge, 0)
return cpuSplit{judge: judge, starter: min(left, 8)}
}
// judgeCores and judgeMemoryGB are what a judge replica needs: two cores
// for a judgment within its budget, and 2 GB for its 1.6 with no prompt
// cache. judgeCoresAlone is what the one judge of a single machine takes,
// past which a model this small hardly gets faster.
const (
judgeCores = 2
judgeCoresAlone = 4
judgeMemoryGB = 2
)
+1 -1
View File
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ func newInstallForm(in *serverInit, host string, found []string, ha bool) *insta
"The request is served unjudged and marked so in the logs. Nothing is refused for the judge's sake.",
}
f.judgeCopies = textSetupField("Copies", strconv.Itoa(j.Replicas), "2",
"Each takes about 1 GB and two CPU threads on whichever node has room.")
"On one machine one copy, on up to four cores; with more machines two, two cores each, on different nodes. Each reserves 2 GB.")
f.judgeBudget = textSetupField("Waits at most", durationYAML(j.Budget), "5s",
"A short text is judged in about two seconds on CPUs.")
judgeFields := []*setupField{f.judgeFail, f.judgeCopies, f.judgeBudget, headingField("Refuses")}
+2
View File
@@ -188,6 +188,8 @@ func newSetupModel(host string, ips []string) setupModel {
// nodes are added once it is up. Either can still be chosen.
in.noNode, in.noModel = true, true
in.standbys = true
// Two judges, on two of the three machines' nodes.
in.judge.Replicas = 2
return setupModel{
ref: &progRef{}, host: host, ips: ips, in: &in, choices: newInstallForm(&in, host, ips, true),
db: [2]dbMachine{newDBMachine(1), newDBMachine(2)}, spin: newSpinner(), width: 100, height: 30,