Fix a SYSVOL sync service that terminated itself, and record the test results

Deploying the image found a real defect. adc-sysvol-sync.service declared
Requires=samba-ad-dc.service, and the sync restarts samba-ad-dc after copying
idmap.ldb. systemd stops units that *require* a service being restarted, so the
sync killed itself with SIGTERM part way through:

  adc-sysvol-sync[2065]: syncing idmap.ldb from 10.10.10.22 (one time)
  adc-sysvol-sync.service: Main process exited, code=killed, status=15/TERM
  adc-sysvol-sync.service: Failed with result 'signal'

The timer started it again and the second run succeeded, so the end state looked
correct while the mechanism was broken — the kind of fault that stays hidden
until it matters. The dependency is Wants= now, which gives the ordering without
the stop propagation, and the restart is --no-block.

The image was tested end to end: two DCs deployed from MAAS, the first
provisioning the domain in 21 seconds and the second joining in 23, both
unattended and on the first attempt. DRS replication is healthy, the FSMO roles
sit where they should, and a file written into SYSVOL on one DC reached the other
within a timer interval, ACLs reset.

A Windows Server 2025 machine then joined the domain: it found the DC through the
_ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs SRV record, Add-Computer succeeded, and after rebooting the
secure channel tested good. nltest reports the DC with the full set of
capabilities Windows expects — PDC GC DS LDAP KDC TIMESERV GTIMESERV WRITABLE
DNS_DC DNS_DOMAIN DNS_FOREST FULL_SECRET. Group Policy refresh completed, and
LDAP queries from the client listed both DCs, the Windows machine account and the
domain users.

One genuine limitation surfaced and now has its own section: Samba does not
implement ADWS, so port 9389 is closed and the PowerShell ActiveDirectory module
cannot be used against these DCs. ADUC, ADSI and raw LDAP are unaffected, which
is what the LDAP queries above demonstrate.

Verified status now separates what was observed from what was not. Notably still
untested: applying an actual GPO, an interactive domain logon, seizing FSMO roles
after losing a DC, BIND9_DLZ, and real bare metal.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-05 15:17:11 +02:00
parent 2b9891be9f
commit bc5d30d048
3 changed files with 88 additions and 21 deletions

View File

@@ -8,8 +8,9 @@ The domain controller is [Samba](https://www.samba.org/) in AD DC mode. To a Win
client it is an Active Directory domain: same Kerberos, same LDAP, same Group Policy,
same `net use`, same domain join.
> **Not tested yet.** The code is written and statically checked; nothing here has been
> built or deployed. See [Verified status](#verified-status).
> Verified end to end on real infrastructure: two domain controllers deployed from
> MAAS, replicating, with a Windows Server 2025 machine joined to the domain. See
> [Verified status](#verified-status) for exactly what was and was not tested.
---
@@ -18,6 +19,7 @@ same `net use`, same domain join.
- [If Active Directory is new to you](#if-active-directory-is-new-to-you)
- [What "highly available" means here](#what-highly-available-means-here)
- [The SYSVOL problem](#the-sysvol-problem)
- [What Samba does not do](#what-samba-does-not-do)
- [How it works](#how-it-works)
- [Requirements](#requirements)
- [Quick start](#quick-start)
@@ -131,6 +133,27 @@ SYSVOL replication, you need Windows DCs.
---
## What Samba does not do
Two gaps matter in practice. Both are Samba's, not this image's.
**No ADWS.** Samba does not implement Active Directory Web Services (TCP 9389), so the
PowerShell `ActiveDirectory` module — `Get-ADUser`, `Get-ADDomain`, `Get-ADDomainController`
**does not work** against a Samba DC. It fails with "Unable to find a default server
with Active Directory Web Services running."
What does work is everything built on LDAP and RPC, which is most of it:
- **ADUC**, ADSI Edit and the rest of the MMC snap-ins
- Raw LDAP from PowerShell (`DirectoryServices.DirectoryEntry`), `dsquery`, `net`
- `samba-tool` on the DCs themselves
So you manage the domain with the graphical tools or with LDAP, not with the AD
PowerShell cmdlets. Third-party ADWS implementations for Samba exist; none is shipped
here.
**No DFS-R for SYSVOL.** Covered in [The SYSVOL problem](#the-sysvol-problem).
## How it works
```
@@ -346,13 +369,22 @@ These are the same class of problem as in the sibling
definition takes the real interface down before any automation runs. It ships
disabled, and MAAS owns the network.
One was found by testing rather than reading:
5. **A sync service that killed itself.** `adc-sysvol-sync.service` originally declared
`Requires=samba-ad-dc.service`. The sync restarts `samba-ad-dc` after copying
`idmap.ldb`, and systemd stops units that *require* a service being restarted — so the
sync died mid-run with SIGTERM. The timer restarted it and it succeeded, so the
outcome looked fine while the mechanism was broken. It is `Wants=` now, and the
restart is `--no-block`.
Two more are specific to this image:
5. **The cloud kernel.** The Debian cloud image ships `linux-image-cloud-amd64`, built
6. **The cloud kernel.** The Debian cloud image ships `linux-image-cloud-amd64`, built
for virtual machines and missing most physical-hardware drivers. A bare-metal DC
deployed with it can come up with no disk or no network. The build swaps in the
generic kernel.
6. **A domain baked into the image.** Installing the packages leaves a default
7. **A domain baked into the image.** Installing the packages leaves a default
`smb.conf`. If that shipped, every machine from the image would start from the same
half-configured directory and `samba-tool domain provision` would refuse to run. The
build deletes all of it.
@@ -361,30 +393,59 @@ Two more are specific to this image:
## Verified status
**Nothing in this repository has been built or deployed.** It is written and statically
checked, no more than that.
Tested end to end on real infrastructure. Be sceptical of anything not listed under
**Verified**.
### Checked
### Test environment
| | |
|---|---|
| Shell syntax | `make lint` passes on every script |
| Generation | `make preseed` and `make customize` produce correct output; the embedded overlay round-trips |
| Samba capability | Debian trixie ships samba 4.22.10, and `samba-ad-dc` does **not** depend on `krb5-kdc` — so it uses the bundled Heimdal KDC, which is Samba's supported configuration for an AD DC. The build asserts this and fails if it ever changes |
| SYSVOL behaviour | Confirmed against the Samba wiki: no DFS-R, no FRS, rsync plus `ntacl sysvolreset` is the documented workaround, and `idmap.ldb` must be synced first |
| Pattern | The build pipeline, curtin hooks and first-boot state machine are adapted from [maas-proxmox](https://github.com/ilkermanap/maas-proxmox), where they were verified end to end on real infrastructure |
| MAAS | 3.7.2 (snap), isolated subnet, MAAS as gateway and DHCP |
| DCs | 2 x (2 vCPU, 6 GB, 32 GiB, UEFI), deployed from this image |
| Windows client | Windows Server 2025 Standard Evaluation, unattended install |
| Realm | `AD.MAASTEST.LAN` / NetBIOS `MAASTEST`, functional level 2008 R2 |
| Image | samba 4.22.10, Debian 13, kernel 6.12.107 |
### Verified
| Area | Evidence |
|---|---|
| Build | 28/28 checks in `make verify`; 412 MB image |
| Release pipeline | Published to a release, downloaded anonymously, SHA-256 matched, uploaded to MAAS |
| Deployment | Both DCs reach `Deployed` from `custom/samba-ad-dc` |
| **Provisioning** | First DC created the domain in 21 s, unattended, first attempt |
| **Joining** | Second DC joined in 23 s, first attempt |
| Kerberos | The built-in self-test obtained a ticket for `Administrator@AD.MAASTEST.LAN` on both DCs |
| Replication | `samba-tool drs showrepl`: outbound neighbours, last attempt successful, 0 consecutive failures |
| FSMO | All five roles on the first DC, as expected |
| **SYSVOL replication** | A file written on DC1 appeared on DC2 within one timer interval; log shows the `idmap.ldb` sync, the rsync and `ntacl sysvolreset` |
| Credential scrubbing | `AD_ADMIN_PASSWORD` removed from `conf.d` after provisioning on both DCs |
| SMB shares | `sysvol` and `netlogon` served; contents readable with domain credentials |
| **Windows DC discovery** | `_ldap._tcp.dc._msdcs.ad.maastest.lan` resolved to `maas-node8:389` |
| **Windows domain join** | `Add-Computer` succeeded; after reboot `PartOfDomain=True`, `Test-ComputerSecureChannel=True` |
| DC capability flags | `nltest /dsgetdc` reports `PDC GC DS LDAP KDC TIMESERV GTIMESERV WRITABLE DNS_DC DNS_DOMAIN DNS_FOREST FULL_SECRET` |
| **Group Policy** | `gpupdate /force /target:computer` completed successfully; `gpresult` shows the domain and site |
| SYSVOL from Windows | Readable over UNC with domain credentials, including the replicated test file |
| LDAP from Windows | `DirectoryServices.DirectoryEntry` listed both DCs and the Windows machine account, and the domain users |
### Not verified
Everything else. Specifically: the image has never been built; no domain has been
provisioned or joined; SYSVOL replication has never run; the self-test has never
executed; `BIND9_DLZ` was not tried; no Windows client has been joined to a domain from
this image; arm64 is untouched.
- **Windows client OS** (10/11) joining — only Windows Server 2025 was tested
- Applying an actual **Group Policy object** and observing its effect; only the GPO refresh mechanism was exercised
- **Interactive** domain logon at the Windows console, and ADUC's GUI. LDAP was proven with explicit credentials, which is the path ADUC uses, but the MMC snap-in itself was not opened
- Losing a DC and **seizing FSMO roles**
- More than two DCs, and concurrent joins
- `BIND9_DLZ` — only `SAMBA_INTERNAL` DNS was used
- `AD_SYSVOL_SYNC` without an SSH key, i.e. the refuse-and-explain path
- Real **bare metal** — both DCs were virtual machines
- **arm64**
- Domain **trusts**, and interop with a Windows DC in the same forest
Treat the first deployment as a test, and read `journalctl -u adc-maas-init -b` on the
node.
### Known not to work
---
- **ADWS**: port 9389 is closed, confirmed from the Windows client. The PowerShell
`ActiveDirectory` module cannot be used. See
[What Samba does not do](#what-samba-does-not-do).
## Licensing