Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5
bd134a7ab9
CI / test (push) Successful in 1m39s
Reading the tool's own output against the real fleet: it chose q8_0 as the best fit and emitted a vLLM profile with no quantisation. q8_0 is a GGUF quantisation that only llama.cpp serves, and from a file rather than a repository — so following that entry loads full-precision weights, which the same output had just listed as not fitting one card. The planner would have caused the out-of-memory it exists to prevent, from a recommendation that looked right. Choosing a precision and choosing an engine turn out to be one decision, so a Precision now carries the engine that serves it, the quantisation flag where one is needed, and whether it lives in a file. A GGUF fit prints a path and says to download it; a vLLM fit prints the repository and passes --quantization so the engine does not quietly load bf16. The arithmetic was right and the recommendation was wrong, which is the failure mode worth having tests for: everything reported a number, and the numbers agreed with each other. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>