`ctl bench` has always been able to work out what one replica can serve — it
ramps concurrency until the SLO breaks and reports the last level that held.
It printed that and nothing kept it, so the one number saying what a replica is
worth lived in whoever ran it's scrollback. Everything downstream then had to
guess: admission applies a single global default for healthy queue depth, and
sizing a model against real demand had nothing to size against.
`ctl bench --save` records it; `ctl capacity` reads it back.
Keyed by model and profile. Capacity belongs to the hardware and the engine
arguments as much as to the weights, so the same model on CPU and on an H100
are two numbers, and one key would overwrite the other on every run.
The profile is looked up from the replica rather than asked for, because the
control plane already knows which profile answers on which endpoint and a
measurement filed under the wrong one is worse than none. A target that is not
a replica — the gateway, usually — is refused with that said: benchmarking the
whole path is worth doing and says nothing about the hardware.
The conclusion is stored, not the ramp. Every level and its latencies are worth
reading once while judging whether the run was sound; keeping them would grow
without bound as a model is re-benchmarked.
Re-measuring replaces. A second run is a better answer to the same question,
not another data point, and keeping both would leave a reader choosing between
numbers with no basis for the choice.
The SLO and the date are stored with it. Capacity means nothing without the
target it was measured against, and hardware and engine builds change — a
measurement is an observation with a date on it, not a fact about the model.
A failed save is reported and not fatal: the run has already cost the GPU time.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
