Commit Graph
4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5 ebce41e22d Stop calling the PostgreSQL store SQLite, and stop guessing where it is
Two things that were only ever confusing, and one of them stopped a command
working on the cluster.

The store type was named SQLite and kept the name when PostgreSQL was added, so
OpenPostgres returned a *SQLite and all seventy-odd methods on the production
store were spelled after the database it was not running on. Nothing broke;
people did. Earlier today I added three methods to *SQLite for a table that on
this cluster only ever lives in PostgreSQL, and the name did not once look
wrong. It is a field, which is all it ever was.

`llmgw users` and `llmgw keys` defaulted --store to a SQLite path. On a
deployment whose store is PostgreSQL every one of them failed with "unable to
open database file" while the right answer sat in auth.store in the config file
beside them; the conclusion an operator draws is that the tool is broken, and
they are not far off. They now ask the server's own configuration before
falling back, and the error names which of the three sources chose the address
— the failure was never the path, it was which one picked it.

The single-machine default still applies last, so a deployment with no config
file keeps working with no flags.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-27 12:20:40 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5 ade689fc8e Refuse to run the destructive store tests against a real database
CI / test (push) Successful in 1m47s
These TRUNCATE every table before each test. Pointed at a deployment that is a
silent and complete data loss — every key, every user, every conversation.

Not hypothetical. I did it: an SSH tunnel to the production database had been
opened minutes earlier for a perfectly good reason, and the same DSN was then
handed to the test suite. Twenty-one users, nine API keys, eighteen sessions,
four hundred and sixty-one usage records and three runtime-added models, gone
between one command and the next. Recovered only because the pre-migration
SQLite file was still there.

The guard is the database name. A test database has to say so, because a check
that could be satisfied by accident would not have stopped this one — the DSN
was entirely correct for what it had been opened for, and catastrophic for
what it was then used for.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-25 18:40:12 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5 5b5e61cb97 Stop a second control plane from placing work behind the first's back
CI / test (push) Successful in 1m35s
The first thing HA needs that a shared store does not give. Two control planes
against one store both reconcile: both see a model wanting two replicas and
none running, and both place. The model ends up with twice what it asked for,
each replica holding GPUs the other's inventory believes are free — and nothing
crashes to say so.

A lease in a table rather than a lock held by a connection. PostgreSQL has
advisory locks and SQLite has nothing like them, and this store keeps one set
of queries for both; a row with an expiry works everywhere, and it survives a
leader being powered off rather than asked to stop, which is the case that
matters. Taking and renewing are the same statement, so the two cannot disagree
about what a held lease looks like, and it is one statement, so two processes
racing cannot both believe they won.

The owner id is random rather than the hostname. A hostname would let a
restarted process match its own stale lease and believe it had been leading all
along — including through the gap that made it restart, during which somebody
else may have taken over and started placing.

A store that cannot be reached is not evidence that somebody else is leading,
so an unreachable store keeps the claim. Two leaders is worse than one, but no
leader means nothing is placed and nothing is evicted, and a brief database
blip should not stop a cluster healing itself.

Unset means leader. Every deployment that existed before this, every
single-control-plane install and every test acts unconditionally, with nothing
to configure.

The same seven assertions run against both backends, which is how the test
harness was caught inheriting a lease between subtests — it passed on SQLite,
where each subtest gets a fresh file, and failed only on PostgreSQL.

What this does not yet do is move agents. A standby holding an agent's stream
is one the leader cannot command, so failover is degraded rather than clean
until agents know more than one address.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-25 18:24:06 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5 a76ebdb79a Run the store on PostgreSQL, chosen by what the address looks like
CI / test (push) Successful in 3m11s
A path is still SQLite and a postgres:// URL is PostgreSQL, so every existing
configuration keeps working untouched and moving is one line changed rather
than a new setting to find. An address of the form @/path/to/file reads the
real one out of that file, which is how a DSN carrying a password stays out of
a configuration that gets copied, diffed and pasted into issues.

The driver is pgx, which is pure Go. That is not a preference: the whole binary
is built with CGO_ENABLED=0 so it runs on a node whose libc is older than the
builder's, and a cgo driver would take that away from every deployment,
including the ones still on SQLite.

Tested against a real PostgreSQL, which found two things nothing else could.
The schema_migrations table is created in Go rather than in a migration file,
so it escaped the port and still said INTEGER — 64 bits in SQLite, 32 in
PostgreSQL, and a millisecond timestamp does not fit, so the very first
migration failed to record that it had run. And the memory migration uses an
FTS5 virtual table with three triggers keeping it in step, which has no
counterpart: PostgreSQL derives a tsvector from the row, so there is nothing
to keep in step and no trigger to forget.

That leaves exactly one query that is not the same sentence in both dialects —
the note search, MATCH against @@ — and it is written out twice rather than
hidden behind a shared spelling that would mean something subtly different in
each. Everything else is one set of queries.

The text search uses the 'simple' configuration rather than English. These are
an agent's own notes, in whatever language it chose, and stemming English
rules over Turkish would quietly stop finding things.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-25 16:18:10 +02:00