Every template and handler message in internal/web goes through a JSON
catalogue under internal/web/locales/<code>/, with English as the fallback.
The language is the person's choice (a cookie set by /_lang/{code}), else
Accept-Language, else landing.language. Tests refuse a key some language
lacks, a translation with other arguments than English, and template text
left in English.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
A new internal/clientip says who sent a request and how: the connection's
address, scheme and Host, or through a configured proxy what it forwarded.
The base URL in pages and setup scripts, isHTTPS for cookies, and the
per-address limits of auth and the sign-in forms use it. /setup scripts are
no-store.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Every key needed an operator with a shell. This adds the login system that
made that necessary, which is the thing I argued against building until it was
asked for — so it is built as if it will be attacked, because a public login
form is.
Signing up produces an account that can do nothing. Approval is what makes it
work and stays on the CLI: having a shell on the control plane is what makes
someone an administrator, and that is a smaller thing to get right than roles
and an admin UI that mints credentials.
The details that matter:
Passwords are argon2id, where a slow hash is correct — the input is chosen by
a human and has a dictionary, which is the opposite of an API key. Both kinds
of authentication now live in this codebase and they are in separate packages
so neither set of assumptions leaks into the other. Length is the only rule:
composition rules push people towards Password1! and cost more entropy than
they buy.
Signup never says whether an address already has an account, and sign-in
answers the same way for a wrong password and a missing account — verifying
against a dummy hash when there is no user, so a stopwatch cannot enumerate
accounts. Account state is checked after the password, not before, so guessing
an address reveals nothing about it. Guessing is bounded per address rather
than per IP: an attacker has many addresses to come from and one to guess
against, and limiting by IP locks out an office behind one NAT.
Sessions are server-side, so signing out and suspending take effect
immediately rather than whenever a token expires; suspension is checked in the
same query that resolves the session, because a second round trip is a check
somebody eventually forgets. Every state-changing form carries a CSRF token
verified against a hash in the session — a cookie authenticates the browser,
not the page that asked.
Key ownership is enforced in the UPDATE rather than by reading first, so a
guessed key id from another account changes nothing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The page explained the API, said keys come from an operator, and left the
reader there. Someone who reaches the address without a key had no route to
getting one, which is where onboarding stopped.
`landing.contact` is that route, because the gateway cannot guess who to ask.
An address becomes a mailto link, an http(s) URL stays a link, and anything
else — a channel, a queue, a person — is shown as text. Other schemes are
never linked: this string comes from configuration, configuration is not
always written by whoever runs the gateway, and a javascript: href on a page
served to every visitor is a short path to a stored XSS. Escaping the text
does not make a scheme safe.
Unconfigured, it now says something rather than nothing, and the page explains
that a key arrives as a one-time link so the reader knows what to expect
before it lands.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Pasting the gateway's address into a browser returned 404, which looks like a
broken endpoint rather than one that tells you how to use it.
Two pages, and the split between them is a security boundary rather than a
layout choice. The landing page is served without a key — it has to be,
because the person reading it is the one who does not have one yet — so it
contains no data at all: it says how to connect, not what is here. Model names
stay behind /v1/models. It reconstructs the address from the forwarded headers
so the copy-pasteable example names the address the client actually used
rather than the internal one; those headers are reflected into displayed text
and never used for a decision.
The dashboard shows nodes, models, replicas, placement failures and usage, and
lives on the admin listener only. That listener is loopback-bound and also
serves pprof, which can dump the process heap — where API keys sit in
plaintext — so reaching the page from elsewhere is an SSH tunnel's job. It is
read-only: anything that mints a credential stays in `llmgw keys`, where it
needs a shell rather than a browser session this project has no way to
authenticate.
Mounting the landing page uncovered a hole in the exemption list. An entry
ending in "/" was a prefix rule, and "/" ends in "/", so exempting the landing
page would have exempted every path there is — authentication still installed,
still logging, and letting the whole API through. "/" is now exact, with a
test enumerating what must and must not be exempt.
Server-rendered templates and one stylesheet, embedded. The single-binary goal
rules out a JavaScript toolchain and nothing on either page needs one.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
