Requests and tokens by tenant, the shares failing and refused by a limit,
first-token p95, budgets spent this period and the day's heaviest users,
filtered by a tenant chooser. Installed beside the cluster dashboard.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Every minute the agent reads nvidia-smi's full report, its NVLink error
counters and the kernel's XID lines. They are published per card,
shown on the node page and the GPU map, charted in Grafana, and five
alerts watch them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
They were read once, at agent start, and published unchanged since.
Each sample now carries utilisation, memory and bandwidth in use, the SM
clock and uncorrected ECC errors. The node page charts each card, the
cluster page the fleet by class, Grafana has a GPU row, and three GPU
alerts are added.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Prometheus, Alertmanager and Grafana, with every rule written against a series
this system actually publishes. Nothing here is aimed at a metric that might
exist.
One scrape target for the whole fleet. Agents publish nothing of their own —
the control plane gathers what they report and republishes it — which is worth
writing down before somebody goes looking for an exporter to install on each
node.
It scrapes metrics_listen, not the admin listener. That one is loopback because
it also serves pprof, and pprof can dump the heap where API keys sit in
plaintext. Metrics are the one thing on it something else genuinely needs, so
they get a port of their own rather than becoming a reason to open the other.
The README shows how to confirm the new port carries nothing else; it answers
404 to both pprof and the admin API.
Nothing is sent anywhere. Alertmanager groups and holds and has no receiver:
where an alert should go is a decision with credentials attached, and a
monitoring system that quietly starts mailing people is worse than one that is
visibly not wired up. critical already routes separately so it can be pointed
somewhere else without touching the rest.
The rules encode what the metrics mean rather than round numbers. A saturation
of 1 is the healthy limit measured by ctl bench, not the point of failure, so
the alert waits five minutes above it. A thirty-second p99 first token is the
threshold because this is CPU inference and would be absurd on a GPU. A model
that is deliberately stopped publishes no series at all, so "nothing serving"
cannot fire for one nobody asked for — which is what lets an on-demand
catalogue sit quiet.
Inhibitions, because a node that is down explains every replica on it and
reporting both buries the cause.
The dashboard is provisioned from a file rather than clicked together, so it
survives a reinstall and can be read in a diff.
Checked by firing one: cordoning a node moved llmgw_node_up to 0, the rule went
pending and then firing after its two minutes, the alert arrived at Alertmanager
with the node in its labels, and uncordoning resolved it. An alerting system
nobody has seen fire is an assumption.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
