4 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5	0d3eb82b9b	Facility-aware placement: racks, PDUs, holds and power caps ... Nodes say where they are with llmgw.io/site, room, row, rack and pdu labels, from agent.yaml or `llmgw ctl label` (kept in the store, over the agent's). Placement spreads a model's replicas across racks and PDUs, keeps a multi-node replica within one domain when its profile says keep_within, places nothing in a domain held with `llmgw ctl facility hold` (optionally draining it), and refuses a shard that would take a domain past its power cap from facility.budgets, counting declared, derived and measured draw. Explain-placement names the domain, and keeps the rejections of a placed replica; `ctl nodes` gains LOCATION and --domain; `ctl facility` lists the domains; the console's Nodes view shows and sets location and holds. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-10-05 01:17:49 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5	d10fad064e	Mark facility steps 1-5 deferred; node sensors collected ... Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-09-30 20:25:50 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5	cd10e086c8	Read nodes' heat and power: GPUs, CPUs, board inlet, RAPL ... Every agent samples, at most every ten seconds: nvidia-smi's temperature, HBM temperature, power draw, enforced limit and throttle reasons per GPU; hwmon's CPU package and board inlet temperatures; and CPU package power from RAPL's energy counters. Sent with heartbeats, published as metrics and shown on the node page; unmeasured sensors are absent, never zero. Observe-only, step 0 of docs/facility-aware-placement.md, which now describes the agent source and what these readings can and cannot say. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-09-30 19:49:08 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5	8724dc027a	Plan facility-aware placement: rack power, temperature and cooling ... A design document for step 5 of resource allocation, deferred: location labels and rack spreading, power budgets with estimated then measured draw, thermal and cooling conditions with hysteresis, opt-in shedding through preemption, pluggable facility sources, and a rollout that is useful at each step and safe when data is missing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-09-30 19:25:31 +02:00