Reaching it meant an SSH tunnel, because the page lived on the admin listener
and that listener is bound to loopback. Opening the port was never the way to
fix that: it also serves pprof, and pprof can dump the process heap, where
every API key sits in plaintext. Exposing the port would have been exposing
the key store.
So the page moves rather than the port. The same dashboard is now mounted at
/admin on the client-facing port, behind the session and CSRF machinery that
already guards /profile, gated on a flag on the account. The admin listener
keeps pprof and metrics and stays on loopback.
One bit, not a role system: it grants looking. Everything that changes the
cluster or issues a credential stays on the CLI, where it needs a shell rather
than a session — which keeps the worst case of a stolen admin cookie to "saw
the cluster" rather than "drained your fleet".
Someone without the flag gets 404, not 403. A 403 confirms the page is there
and that admin accounts exist here, which is free reconnaissance; 404 is what
every other unknown path returns. The profile page does not show a link to a
door the visitor cannot open.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Every key needed an operator with a shell. This adds the login system that
made that necessary, which is the thing I argued against building until it was
asked for — so it is built as if it will be attacked, because a public login
form is.
Signing up produces an account that can do nothing. Approval is what makes it
work and stays on the CLI: having a shell on the control plane is what makes
someone an administrator, and that is a smaller thing to get right than roles
and an admin UI that mints credentials.
The details that matter:
Passwords are argon2id, where a slow hash is correct — the input is chosen by
a human and has a dictionary, which is the opposite of an API key. Both kinds
of authentication now live in this codebase and they are in separate packages
so neither set of assumptions leaks into the other. Length is the only rule:
composition rules push people towards Password1! and cost more entropy than
they buy.
Signup never says whether an address already has an account, and sign-in
answers the same way for a wrong password and a missing account — verifying
against a dummy hash when there is no user, so a stopwatch cannot enumerate
accounts. Account state is checked after the password, not before, so guessing
an address reveals nothing about it. Guessing is bounded per address rather
than per IP: an attacker has many addresses to come from and one to guess
against, and limiting by IP locks out an office behind one NAT.
Sessions are server-side, so signing out and suspending take effect
immediately rather than whenever a token expires; suspension is checked in the
same query that resolves the session, because a second round trip is a check
somebody eventually forgets. Every state-changing form carries a CSRF token
verified against a hash in the session — a cookie authenticates the browser,
not the page that asked.
Key ownership is enforced in the UPDATE rather than by reading first, so a
guessed key id from another account changes nothing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Issuing a key worked; getting it to the person it was issued for did not. The
operator had a secret on their terminal and no way to send it that did not
leave a bearer credential in a chat log forever.
`keys create --claim` prints a link instead. GET shows a button and consumes
nothing; POST reveals the key and burns the link. That split is not politeness
— chat clients, mail scanners and link previewers fetch URLs the moment they
are posted, so a GET that consumed the claim would mean the first thing to
unfurl the link destroys the key before anyone reads it.
A pending claim has to hold the key somewhere, which would otherwise put a
working credential in the database and undo what hashing bought. So the key is
sealed with a key derived from the link's own token, and the token is never
stored — only its hash. A database leak yields two useless hashes and a blob
nothing in the database can open. HKDF rather than the raw token, so the value
used for lookup can never become the value that decrypts.
Consuming is one UPDATE moving claimed_at off NULL, so two people opening the
same link produce one key rather than two copies. A used link, an expired one
and a token that was never real all render identically, because saying which
confirms that a token was once valid. The page is no-store, no-referrer and
noindex: the URL is itself the credential.
`GET /me` reports a key's own limits and spend, so nobody has to ask an
operator to read a dashboard they cannot reach. Outside /v1, because it is not
part of the OpenAI API.
docs/onboarding.md is written for whoever operates this, including the parts
that are deliberately absent — no self-service, no SSO, and why.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Phase 5 begins. This is the persistence layer for the things the cluster
cannot reconstruct — who may call, what they are allowed, what they used.
Everything else llmgw knows is still derived from the fleet, which cannot be
wrong about itself the way a database can (§6.5).
SQLite behind an interface. The plan justified that by write volume, which was
the wrong argument: the write path is batched anyway, and a 500-row
transaction every 200ms is nothing for either engine. The real argument is the
failure mode. Postgres is a second service, and a gateway that stops serving
because its accounting database is unreachable is worse than one that buffers
some accounting. Embedded means the store shares the gateway's fate instead of
adding an independent way to be down. That reasoning stops holding at two
instances, where budgets have to be counted somewhere shared — so the
interface is here from the start, the SQL is portable, and migrations are per
dialect with shared version numbers.
Keys are stored as sha256 and nothing else, so a database leak hands over no
working credential. The fast hash is deliberate: the input is 256 random bits
with no dictionary to attack, so argon2 would buy nothing and charge tens of
milliseconds per request. That assumption is written down next to the code
that depends on it.
Two things the schema now says that it did not: budgets are integer
micro-units, because repeated addition of floats drifts; and an empty model
allowlist forbids everything while an absent one permits everything, which the
resolver has to keep distinct.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
