Commit Graph
3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5 e519dc587c Serve the cluster dashboard over the web, without serving pprof with it
CI / test (push) Successful in 1m21s
Reaching it meant an SSH tunnel, because the page lived on the admin listener
and that listener is bound to loopback. Opening the port was never the way to
fix that: it also serves pprof, and pprof can dump the process heap, where
every API key sits in plaintext. Exposing the port would have been exposing
the key store.

So the page moves rather than the port. The same dashboard is now mounted at
/admin on the client-facing port, behind the session and CSRF machinery that
already guards /profile, gated on a flag on the account. The admin listener
keeps pprof and metrics and stays on loopback.

One bit, not a role system: it grants looking. Everything that changes the
cluster or issues a credential stays on the CLI, where it needs a shell rather
than a session — which keeps the worst case of a stolen admin cookie to "saw
the cluster" rather than "drained your fleet".

Someone without the flag gets 404, not 403. A 403 confirms the page is there
and that admin accounts exist here, which is free reconnaissance; 404 is what
every other unknown path returns. The profile page does not show a link to a
door the visitor cannot open.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-16 10:46:45 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5 79e459d9ff Let people change their own password, and operators reset a lost one
CI / test (push) Failing after 1m11s
The account system shipped without either, which made the first forgotten
password an unanswerable support request.

Changing it requires the current one. A session is what an attacker gets from
a borrowed laptop or a stolen cookie; the password is what they do not have,
and without the check the first thing they would do is take the account.

Every session is closed, including the browser doing the changing — leaving
the others open would mean a password change does nothing about the reason
someone is changing it. A new session is then opened for the browser in front
of us, so the person who just proved their password is not thrown back to the
sign-in page. That response also carries a new CSRF cookie, so the forms it
renders take the new token rather than the one the request arrived with; there
is a test that posts a form from that exact page.

Guessing the current password is bounded the same way sign-in is, because
someone holding a stolen session should not get unlimited attempts at the
password that would let them keep it.

There is no self-service reset: this gateway sends no email, and a reset link
with nowhere to send it is not a reset. `llmgw users reset-password` is the
operator's answer, and it closes their sessions too — if someone lost their
password, the reason might be that somebody else has it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-16 09:39:11 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5 216fc9bb03 Let people sign up, be approved, and issue their own keys
CI / test (push) Successful in 1m9s
Every key needed an operator with a shell. This adds the login system that
made that necessary, which is the thing I argued against building until it was
asked for — so it is built as if it will be attacked, because a public login
form is.

Signing up produces an account that can do nothing. Approval is what makes it
work and stays on the CLI: having a shell on the control plane is what makes
someone an administrator, and that is a smaller thing to get right than roles
and an admin UI that mints credentials.

The details that matter:

Passwords are argon2id, where a slow hash is correct — the input is chosen by
a human and has a dictionary, which is the opposite of an API key. Both kinds
of authentication now live in this codebase and they are in separate packages
so neither set of assumptions leaks into the other. Length is the only rule:
composition rules push people towards Password1! and cost more entropy than
they buy.

Signup never says whether an address already has an account, and sign-in
answers the same way for a wrong password and a missing account — verifying
against a dummy hash when there is no user, so a stopwatch cannot enumerate
accounts. Account state is checked after the password, not before, so guessing
an address reveals nothing about it. Guessing is bounded per address rather
than per IP: an attacker has many addresses to come from and one to guess
against, and limiting by IP locks out an office behind one NAT.

Sessions are server-side, so signing out and suspending take effect
immediately rather than whenever a token expires; suspension is checked in the
same query that resolves the session, because a second round trip is a check
somebody eventually forgets. Every state-changing form carries a CSRF token
verified against a hash in the session — a cookie authenticates the browser,
not the page that asked.

Key ownership is enforced in the UPDATE rather than by reading first, so a
guessed key id from another account changes nothing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-16 09:32:35 +02:00