The tree was rendered and then, underneath it, a form with a dropdown asking
which of those rows you meant. The tree already said. Picking a branch, reading
its current numbers, scrolling past the tree and selecting the same branch from
a list is three steps to do one thing, and two of them are a chance to pick the
wrong row.
A quota belongs to a branch, so the form opens on it: each row links to
?edit=scope:id, that row renders its form inline, pre-filled with what is set
there now and naming the branch in full.
By link rather than by disclosure on every row: a collapsed form per branch
would put a form in the markup for every group on a page whose job is to be
read as a tree. One is open at a time, and the rest keep their link.
Clearing moved into that form as a second submit, so a row that is not being
edited has one control and not two.
Saving closes it. Re-rendering the form over the row it just changed hides the
result and invites submitting the same thing twice.
The note about a quota being shared came out of the footer: the open form says
it, at the point where somebody is about to do it.
The dropdown's parsing went with it rather than being left unreachable.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
