Two halves of the same problem: nothing stopped a model being placed on a node
that could not hold it, and nothing ever removed the weights of a model that
had been deleted from the catalog.
Placement now has a disk check, shaped exactly like the memory one it sits
beside, with one addition: it is skipped on a node that already holds the
weights. A node holding the file needs no room for it, and without that the
node best placed to run a model — because it already has it — is the one most
likely to be rejected, since holding the file is what used the space.
Reclaiming is the dangerous half, so the whole design is about what it will
not do. llmgw deletes only files it fetched itself, and that is a calculation
rather than a heuristic: the cache name is a hash of the source, so the set of
wanted files can be computed from the catalog exactly. Anything without that
name was put there by an operator — scp, a shared mount, a copy by hand — and
is none of this system's business however unreferenced it looks. A model that
took a week to copy must not be removable by a command someone ran to tidy up.
The node checks every path again before unlinking it, and that duplication is
the point. The control plane knows the catalog; the node knows its disk. A
control plane that is wrong, newer than the agent, or tampered with must not be
able to talk a node into deleting something, so the agent refuses anything
outside its own cache directory or without the cache name — including a path
that tries to traverse out of it.
Listing is the default and deleting takes --collect. The summary says "asked to
remove", because each node decides, and one that refuses a path it cannot prove
it fetched is this working rather than failing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
