Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5 634f87ba15 Provision nodes with the host CPU model
Proxmox defaults a VM to kvm64, which hides AVX, AVX2, FMA and even SSE4.2
from the guest. llama.cpp then loads libggml-cpu-x64.so — its scalar
baseline — instead of the backend built for the host's instruction set, and
an inference node is not slightly slower but unusable.

Measured on node05, an 8-core VM on a Xeon E5-2680 v4, same weights, same
thread count, the only change being --cpu host:

  Qwen2.5-Coder     kvm64   host
  1.5B q4_K_M        5.80  39.09  tok/s
  3B   q4_K_M        2.90  20.51
  7B   q4_K_M        1.33   9.88

Prompt processing went from 7.6 to 143.8, a factor of nineteen.

This cost an afternoon because nothing looks broken. The node registers, the
engine starts, the replies are correct; every number is just small, and the
conclusion that suggests itself is that CPU inference is hopeless rather
than that the VM cannot multiply efficiently. A 14B model at 1.7 tokens a
second was nearly written off on that basis.

The trade is live migration, which a VM pinned to the host CPU cannot do.
For a node whose job is arithmetic that is the right way round, and --cpu
overrides it where it is not.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-16 20:42:48 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5 c1ac2f022f Onboard a node with a script, and find two examples that never worked
New nodes had been joined by hand, four times, by me. There was no procedure,
so there was nothing to be wrong — and nothing to be right either. Two scripts
now: provision-node.sh makes the VM on Proxmox, onboard-node.sh gives it an
identity. They are separate because they are run by different people with
different access, and the second must run where the certificate authority is,
which is the one part that cannot be delegated.

Running them turned up why phase 4 was never verified. FabricAttachment
carried no koanf tags, so the `name:` key the shipped example documents bound
to nothing and `rate_gbps` was never read at all. An agent configured exactly
as instructed refused to start with "fabrics[0]: name is required" — naming
the key the operator had just written. Every fabric in this project had been
configured in a Go test, where the tags do not matter.

The server example did not load either: its models had no source, so it failed
validation the moment anything tried to parse it.

Both examples are now parsed by a test. A published example that has never
been loaded is a guess, and these two had been guesses since they were
written.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-16 12:28:36 +02:00