Commit Graph
20 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5 0d3eb82b9b Facility-aware placement: racks, PDUs, holds and power caps
Nodes say where they are with llmgw.io/site, room, row, rack and pdu labels,
from agent.yaml or `llmgw ctl label` (kept in the store, over the agent's).
Placement spreads a model's replicas across racks and PDUs, keeps a
multi-node replica within one domain when its profile says keep_within,
places nothing in a domain held with `llmgw ctl facility hold` (optionally
draining it), and refuses a shard that would take a domain past its power
cap from facility.budgets, counting declared, derived and measured draw.
Explain-placement names the domain, and keeps the rejections of a placed
replica; `ctl nodes` gains LOCATION and --domain; `ctl facility` lists the
domains; the console's Nodes view shows and sets location and holds.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 01:17:49 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5 82a63cfc6e Read what wears a GPU out: XIDs, remapped rows, PCIe and NVLink errors
Every minute the agent reads nvidia-smi's full report, its NVLink error
counters and the kernel's XID lines. They are published per card,
shown on the node page and the GPU map, charted in Grafana, and five
alerts watch them.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-01 16:02:07 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5 bd36798b15 Sample GPU utilisation and memory every heartbeat, and chart them
They were read once, at agent start, and published unchanged since.
Each sample now carries utilisation, memory and bandwidth in use, the SM
clock and uncorrected ECC errors. The node page charts each card, the
cluster page the fleet by class, Grafana has a GPU row, and three GPU
alerts are added.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-01 15:42:17 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5 cd10e086c8 Read nodes' heat and power: GPUs, CPUs, board inlet, RAPL
Every agent samples, at most every ten seconds: nvidia-smi's temperature,
HBM temperature, power draw, enforced limit and throttle reasons per GPU;
hwmon's CPU package and board inlet temperatures; and CPU package power
from RAPL's energy counters. Sent with heartbeats, published as metrics
and shown on the node page; unmeasured sensors are absent, never zero.
Observe-only, step 0 of docs/facility-aware-placement.md, which now
describes the agent source and what these readings can and cannot say.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-30 19:49:08 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5 990d82d801 Reserve CPU cores and require memory for CPU models
A profile's cpu_cores is reserved out of its node's CPUs by placement, as
memory is, and becomes the engine's thread count. Agents report their CPU
count in registration and heartbeats. New CPU models must declare memory;
model views show reserved against measured memory with warnings, and
ctl model resources sets both for a stored model.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-30 17:43:13 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5 d7f1c1d545 Open a held model to its replicas, nodes and room for more
The Held tab's model name opens a card: each replica with its node, state,
age, CPU and memory, the room for more found by dry-running the scheduler
on a copy of the inventory, and a form for the always-running and
under-load replica counts. An always-running count placement cannot meet
is refused with the reason. Headroom is also on the admin API.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-30 10:19:31 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5 7bb360fc78 Measure two nodes' fabric rail by rail: llmgw ctl fabric-test
doctor checks a node alone, and every check can pass while two nodes still
cannot reach each other. ctl fabric-test A B asks B's agent for an
ib_write_bw server and A's for the client, adapter by adapter as NCCL pairs
them, one rail at a time, and grades each against its link's rate. It goes
through the agents' streams, so there is no SSH between nodes; the agent
installs perftest the first time, and names the RoCE v2 GID itself.

The result is read from perftest's table by its heading, not a column
number. Agents now list the requests they answer beyond the usual
(Register.features), and the control plane refuses a test on one too old to
answer instead of waiting minutes for it. The forwarding dispatcher carries
the new capability, and its test says so: a missing forward would have made
the command quietly unavailable in production.

Not yet run over real InfiniBand or RoCE; this cluster has neither.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 21:29:23 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5 20479a2d5f Find multi-node NVLink domains, place across them, and show them as racks
A GB200 NVL72 rack or an NVLink Switch system is a scale-up island: its
GPUs reach each other over NVLink whatever node they are in. Each GPU
now reports its fabric from nvidia-smi -q - state, status, ClusterUUID,
CliqueId, bandwidth - at registration and once a minute after, since a
fabric manager restarting drops every card out at once; and each node
reports nvidia-imex and its channels, without which the domain's GPUs
cannot share memory across nodes. A single machine's NVSwitch, which
reports a cluster of zeros, is no domain.

A replica spanning nodes is placed inside one domain first, on nodes
whose every card is joined and whose IMEX is up, and its shards are
told NCCL_MNNVL_ENABLE=1; InfiniBand is the fallback.

/admin/nvlink draws each domain as a rack - the NVLink Switch band on
top, light running down a backplane, trays of GPU chips that glow when
joined, pulse red when not, turn amber on degraded bandwidth - and
lists what keeps a tray out. A node's page shows its GPU-by-GPU NVLink
matrix, each card's NUMA node and nearest adapter, and its domain and
IMEX. doctor checks joining, bandwidth, IMEX and its channel; metrics
llmgw_gpu_nvlink_joined and llmgw_imex_up; /api/v1/nvlink.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 09:07:59 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5 5bbc619a31 Map every InfiniBand fabric, draw it, and place replicas by it
The control plane asks one node on each physical fabric to run
ibnetdiscover every five minutes and parses the text itself, so a
format the parser has not met is a control plane upgrade, not one on
every node. From the map it works out the switch tiers (leaf, spine,
core, by distance from the adapters), which adapter is which node's,
which cables trained below the rate the rest of their kind run at, and
whether the rails line up: every node's Nth adapter on its own leaf.

A page per fabric (/admin/fabrics) draws it: switches in their tiers,
adapters fanned out under their leaves, cables coloured by rate and
bundled, degraded ones marching red with a marker, and the cluster's
own adapters live - down ports glowing red, and particles running each
cable as fast as its adapter is sending and receiving, from the
counters. It zooms, pans, fades what a hovered switch or adapter does
not touch, opens a panel of detail on a click, colours by rail, finds a
node, and refreshes every fifteen seconds. The data is also at
/api/v1/fabrics/{id}/topology.

Placement reads the map: a replica spanning nodes takes nodes of one
leaf together when it can, and nodes whose cable trained short last.

Static assets are named by their content, as the stylesheet already
was.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 08:46:23 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5 23648fa19a Watch each fabric's subnet managers, and keep a fabric one through a failover
A fabric's identity was its master subnet manager, which changes on a
failover: for the minute its ports took to agree, one fabric read as
two, and a name covering it as two separate fabrics. Each agent now
also lists every subnet manager on a fabric (saquery SMIR, through one
port per master, once a minute); managers listed together are one
fabric, named by the lowest GUID among them, so the identity survives
the master changing.

The same list says what a fabric can survive. The cluster page's new
subnet manager table, /api/v1/fabrics, doctor and metrics
(llmgw_fabric_master_sm, llmgw_fabric_subnet_managers,
llmgw_fabric_problems) show each fabric's master, priority and
standbys, and say when a fabric has no standby, its ports disagree on
the master, ports are up with no subnet manager (INIT), or the master
changed in the last hour. Every change of master a port reports is
kept, and a fabric's last day of them is listed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 07:47:03 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5 77fe801892 Tell independent fabrics apart by their subnet manager, not their name
A fabric was what agent.yaml called it. With several independent
InfiniBand fabrics at a site, two given one name would have had a
replica spread across both, starting and then hanging on its first
collective. Each active InfiniBand port now reports the master subnet
manager it sees (sminfo, asked once a minute), which every port on one
fabric shares and ports on separate fabrics cannot; a RoCE port reports
the IP network of its RoCE v2 address. Ports also carry their node and
port GUIDs.

Placement divides a declared fabric by that physical identity and forms
a replica on one part only; a node whose adapters for one name are on
two fabrics is refused, and a node that cannot say is kept apart from
those that can. /api/v1/fabrics and the cluster page list each physical
fabric with its subnet manager, and say when one name covers two
fabrics, two names one fabric, an adapter is up but undeclared, or a
node cannot be checked. doctor reports each port's subnet manager, and
an agent on a node with adapters installs infiniband-diags when sminfo
is missing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 07:29:16 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5 93bd16f00e Watch InfiniBand ports while the agent runs, not only when it starts
A port's state was read once, at registration: one that went down later
left its node on the fabric, offered multi-node work that would hang on
its first collective, until somebody restarted the agent. The agent now
re-reads every IB and RoCE port on each heartbeat - state, physical
state, rate and the error and data counters - and when the fabrics it
can carry traffic on change, says so once; the control plane replaces
the node's fabrics, which is what placement reads.

The ports are exported as llmgw_ib_port_active (with state and
phys_state, so an unplugged cable reads differently from a missing
subnet manager), llmgw_ib_port_rate_gbps and llmgw_ib_port_counter_total,
and a node's page lists them with the fabric each carries and any error
counter that is not zero.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-29 00:13:54 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5 daed835d88 Measure each node's CPU and memory, and give every node a page
The nodes are CPU machines, and nothing measured how busy one was: the
heartbeat carried GPU memory and disk, and llmgw_node_memory_bytes is the
total. The agent now reads /proc between heartbeats - CPU across all
cores, load averages, memory used and available, and each engine's
process group's cores and resident memory - and sends it with the
heartbeat. Nothing new runs on the nodes and Prometheus needs no new
target: the control plane exports it with the rest of the fleet, as
llmgw_node_cpu_utilization_percent, llmgw_node_cpus, llmgw_node_load,
llmgw_node_memory_used_bytes, llmgw_node_memory_available_bytes,
llmgw_shard_cpu_cores and llmgw_shard_memory_bytes. A measurement more
than a minute old is left out rather than repeated.

The cluster page's node table shows CPU and RAM as bars, and each node
links to a page of its own: current CPU, RAM, load and disk, the engines
on it with their cores and memory, and an hour of CPU, RAM, load,
per-model cores and memory and queue depth from Prometheus. It refreshes
in place.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-28 23:21:23 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5.5 7d97c6b74f Install a node's engines on the node, instead of trusting what is there
A node ran whatever llama-server somebody had once unpacked on it. Onboarding
checked an engine only when told its path, installed none, and a node with
nothing on it registered as ready. The one time that went wrong it went wrong
invisibly: the binary was there, executable, and could not start for want of
libgomp1, while the node reported healthy.

The control plane now says which engines every node has, at which version —
`engines:` in server.yaml, defaulting to the llama.cpp build this release was
checked against — and each agent converges on it. What only the node can
know, the node works out: the build for its processor and driver (CUDA with
its runtime when an NVIDIA driver is loaded, CPU otherwise), the OS packages
that build needs from its own package sources, and whether the result runs.
Every archive is checked against the sha256 GitHub publishes for it and
unpacked refusing any path or link that leaves the install directory. ldd
names a missing library outright; running `--version` proves the rest. Only
then is a directory marked installed, and it is checked again every ten
minutes, because an unrelated upgrade can remove a library.

An engine is reported only once installed and seen to run, or when the
agent's configuration names it on purpose — never because something happened
to be on PATH. The agent now says when it has probed, so an empty list means
"has none" rather than "too old to say": a node rebuilt from nothing is no
longer a candidate for every model at the moment it can run none of them.
Placement's refusal carries the node's own words, "installing: downloading
llama-b10991-bin-ubuntu-x64.tar.gz (16 MB)", and so do `ctl nodes` and the
cluster page, along with a warning for a CPU without AVX2 — the VM CPU type
that makes everything five times slower and nothing look wrong.

Agents also report their OS, architecture, vector extensions and NVIDIA
driver. Onboarding installs llmgw itself from the CI release for the node's
architecture, checked against the release's checksums, rather than copying
whatever binary the operator's machine had.

vLLM and SGLang are not installed yet: they are Python environments of
several gigabytes, not an archive, and still have to be named in the agent's
configuration.

Also fixes a race on the weights fingerprint, which two heartbeat loops touch
during a failover.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-28 10:59:59 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5 8fd4c1392d Stop handing the same memory to two models
Placement compared a profile's memory requirement against the node's total, so
a 31 GB machine accepted two models that each declared 15: each was asked about
on its own, and nothing recorded that the first had claimed anything. GPUs were
never handed out twice this way — they are tracked as claimed indices — and
memory was, because the allocation carried no figure for it.

An allocation records what its profile asked for, and eligibility subtracts
what a node already owes before comparing. The rejection names both numbers,
because "needs 15" beside a 31 GB machine reads as a bug in the scheduler
rather than a full node.

Declared, not measured. A profile that says 15 is treated as holding 15 whether
the process has touched that much yet or not — the alternative is deciding
against what a model has grown into so far, which is wrong every time one is
still loading.

Zero is nobody said, and claims nothing. Counting it would let one undeclared
model make a whole node look full.

Adoption after a restart re-reads the figure from the catalog rather than from
the agent: what a profile asked for is not something a running process reports,
and a control plane that forgot every claim on restart would put a second large
model onto a node already full of the first.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-27 17:44:26 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5 753f4e3265 Let a node say how much room it has left
Disk was the one resource nothing reported. `statfs` was already being called
on every model directory, but only to ask whether the filesystem was a network
one — the free space it returns in the same struct was thrown away. So the
only way to find out why a node was filling up was to ssh to it, which is what
this system exists to avoid.

Reported per filesystem rather than per configured directory. Free space
belongs to the disk, not the path: two model directories on one disk are one
pool of bytes, and counting them separately would let the control plane add
24 GB to 24 GB and place a 40 GB model on a node that has 24.

Shared filesystems are summed separately from local ones and left out of a
node's own total. Space on a filer belongs to everyone mounting it, so twenty
nodes would otherwise each report the same free terabyte, and a scheduler
would place twenty models into room for one.

Nothing reported means nothing is known, everywhere: an agent too old to send
storage and a node with no model directories both send nothing, and both must
read as unknown rather than as a full disk. `ctl nodes` and the dashboard show
a dash, the metric is absent rather than zero, and a missing directory — which
is what an unmounted filer looks like — is skipped rather than reported as
having no space.

Shown as free out of total, because the first is useless without the second:
8 GB free is comfortable on a 10 TB filer and nearly full on a 10 GB root
partition, and only the second stops a model being placed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-18 09:38:57 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5 c13c567cc5 Know where the weights are, without owning the storage
Storage will be different at every installation — Lustre, NFS over RDMA, an
image exported with SRP or NVMe-oF, local NVMe, an rsync — so llmgw observes
it rather than managing it. An agent told which directories to look in
reports what it can see; how the files got there is nobody's business here,
and a node told nothing reports nothing and behaves exactly as every node
did before this existed.

That fact buys two things. Placement prefers a node that already holds the
model over one that must first move tens of gigabytes, as a preference and
never a filter: fetching them is a valid answer, and refusing to place would
turn a slow start into no start at all. And ctl status shows what each
fabric holds.

Per fabric because fabrics are not connected to one another. Weights in
ib-a are not weights in ib-b — the only path between them is the management
network — so a model seeded into one fabric leaves the rest of the cluster
unable to serve it without a slow copy, and nothing said so before now. One
shared filer counts the same as twenty local copies, because "can this
fabric serve it" is the question being asked.

Three distinctions the tests hold to, because each is a way to get this
quietly wrong. A node that was never asked to look must rank with one that
looked and has nothing, or enabling the feature on a single node would
drain every other. An empty directory is not weights, because a
half-finished download looks exactly like one and would send placement to a
node whose engine then fails to load. And local storage is never mistaken
for shared: a filer read as local costs an unnecessary copy, while local
read as shared would have the cluster believe a model is everywhere when it
is on one node.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-17 08:21:16 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5 3081c6f69b Place on nodes that can actually hold the model
Placement had no idea how much memory a node has or a model needs. A CPU
profile has no card to be free, so eligibleNodes accepted every ready node:
Qwen2.5-Coder 14B, whose working set is about 24 GB, would have been placed
just as happily on one of the 8 GB nodes, which reports itself perfectly
healthy right up until the OOM killer arrives.

node_selector was yesterday's stopgap and it is the operator restating by
hand something the system can know. Agents now report MemTotal, profiles
declare min_memory_gb, and placement filters on it, naming what was short —
"has 8 GB of memory, needs 24" is actionable where "no candidates were
considered" is not. The label selector stays, because "this node is for
coding models" is a real thing to want to say that memory does not express.

Two deliberate non-exclusions. A profile with no requirement fits anywhere,
which is every profile that exists today. And a node that reports no memory
is still usable: an agent older than the field says nothing, and letting a
control plane upgrade quietly empty half a fleet is a worse failure than the
one this prevents.

ctl nodes grows a MEM column showing "-" rather than 0 for a node that did
not say, because an old agent is not a small machine.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-16 23:12:44 +02:00
Ilker ManapandClaude Opus 5 c1ac2f022f Onboard a node with a script, and find two examples that never worked
New nodes had been joined by hand, four times, by me. There was no procedure,
so there was nothing to be wrong — and nothing to be right either. Two scripts
now: provision-node.sh makes the VM on Proxmox, onboard-node.sh gives it an
identity. They are separate because they are run by different people with
different access, and the second must run where the certificate authority is,
which is the one part that cannot be delegated.

Running them turned up why phase 4 was never verified. FabricAttachment
carried no koanf tags, so the `name:` key the shipped example documents bound
to nothing and `rate_gbps` was never read at all. An agent configured exactly
as instructed refused to start with "fabrics[0]: name is required" — naming
the key the operator had just written. Every fabric in this project had been
configured in a Go test, where the tags do not matter.

The server example did not load either: its models had no source, so it failed
validation the moment anything tried to parse it.

Both examples are now parsed by a test. A published example that has never
been loaded is a guess, and these two had been guesses since they were
written.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-16 12:28:36 +02:00
ilkerandClaude Opus 5 06672d1b85 Phase 3 (1/3): cluster inventory and placement
The two hard constraints from plan §1.1 are enforced structurally rather than
checked after the fact: there is no code path that can combine nodes from two
fabrics, and only GPUs of the profile's class are ever considered. Getting
either wrong produces a replica that starts, passes health checks, and then
hangs or crawls under load — which looks like success until traffic arrives.

- inventory: nodes, hardware, fabric attachments, allocations. A re-registering
  agent cannot clear an operator's cordon, since a cordon is usually in place
  because something is wrong with the node. A GPU with an ECC fault or another
  process on it is not free in any useful sense. Replicas are released whole,
  because they fail whole.
- placement: highest-priority profile that fits, with every rejected candidate
  explained. "Unschedulable" on its own tells an operator nothing about which
  of six constraints bit.
- bin packing fills partly used nodes first so whole nodes stay free for large
  models that cannot be split; multi-node replicas get the emptiest machines
  instead, being the least movable thing in the cluster.
- NVLink-aware GPU selection keeps a tensor-parallel group inside one domain
  where the topology is known, falling back to lowest free indices otherwise.

Property-based tests generate 400 random clusters and assert the invariants on
every placement produced: one fabric per multi-node replica, only that fabric's
HCAs per shard, one GPU class, no unhealthy or already-allocated GPU. The
table-driven tests cover the cases someone thought of; these cover the rest.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-16 02:07:29 +02:00