A person was in exactly one project, chosen at approval, and could not
use the gateway before that. People belong to several teams and to
none, so:
- memberships: a person is a member of any number of organizations,
teams and projects, or of none; a member of a team or organization
may use every project in it. users join/leave, and the people page
adds and takes out from either side. Approval no longer needs a
project.
- personal keys: a key may have an owner and no project. /profile asks
what a new key spends against; keys create --for does the same.
auth.personal sets default limits for personal use or turns it off.
- limits for people: --scope user holds a person across every key,
project and the chat page; --per-member on an org, team or project
gives each member their own share there. Resolution folds the tree,
each per-member limit for the key's owner, and the owner's own, each
in its own pool; the quotas page shows and sets both.
- the chat page asks what to spend against and checks it per message.
- usage records who spent it, so a person's budget survives a restart,
personal use and chat included; restore no longer drops rows with no
project.
Leaving a project revokes the keys made there unless another membership
still reaches it. A personal key keeps no threads or notes, which are
per project, and is refused rather than dropped into the anonymous pool.
Migration 0010 turns each person's project into a membership, adds
usage.user_id and backfills it, and makes api_keys.project_id nullable.
SQLite cannot drop NOT NULL, so the table is rebuilt; that needs foreign
keys off, which only works outside a transaction, so migrations marked
for it run on one connection with foreign_key_check before commit.
Tested on a populated SQLite store with claims, and on a copy of the
cluster's PostgreSQL store: 5 people became members, 17 keys and 3
claims intact, 145 of 577 usage rows and all 69 chat rows attributed.
The PostgreSQL store tests, including new membership cases, pass on 16.
users move is gone; join and leave replace it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Nothing in the tree could be renamed, moved or removed, and an approved
person stayed in the project they were first put in — from the web or
the CLI. Now:
- /admin/users is the tree, each project opening onto its people and
keys, with approve, move, suspend, reinstate and remove for people,
revoke for keys, and add, rename, move and remove at every level,
plus a search over every account. Forms post and get the page back,
so it works with no script; htmx 2.0.11 (0BSD, embedded, checked
against npm's integrity hash) swaps only the changed part, keeping
open projects open.
- llmgw org tree/add/rename/move/remove, users move/delete, and
keys list --all.
- Projects, teams and organizations are named by id, path
(Acme/platform/gateway) or unique name; users by id or email. With a
single project --project can be left out, instead of defaulting to
"default", which a tree built from the web does not have.
Moving a person moves the keys they made; operator keys stay with the
project. Only empty things are removed, and never a project that had a
key, since usage history refers to it.
Also: keys init no longer reparents an existing team or project;
reinstating an account with no project is refused (a rejected signup
used to come back active and fail at its first key); rejecting a
signup removes it; keys limits --budget takes whole units like the
quotas page.
Checked in headless Chrome: a move from an open project updates the
page in place, keeps the project open, and the search still filters.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
An account is approved into a project, a project belongs to a team, a team to
an organization — and until now the only way to make any of them was `llmgw
keys init` on the control plane. So the first thing to do after installing was
leave the interface you were already in, and an approval form with an empty
dropdown gave no hint why.
The accounts page now creates all three.
Creating a container is not granting access: nobody can use one until an
account is approved into it, which is the step already on this page. Quotas stay
on the CLI. Making somewhere to put people is structural; raising what they may
spend is financial, and a stolen admin session should be able to do the first
and not the second.
Ids are random now instead of slugs of the name, which fixes a bug that only
appears when you have a second organization — which is exactly what this
feature invites. Team ids were slugs in one flat namespace and PutTeam upserts
on id, so creating "platform" under a second organization moved the first one's
team into it. Nothing failed. The team changed owner.
Create* is separate from Put* rather than replacing it. The upserts exist so
`keys init` can be re-run while provisioning a machine; a person filling in a
form means something else by a name that already exists, and gets told.
A duplicate is refused among siblings only. Two companies both having a
"platform" team is ordinary, and refusing the second would be the flat namespace
again wearing a better error message.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
